Why some cruise charter projects fail before contract: payment terms, risk, and expectations
- Andrea Trevisan
- Jan 13
- 6 min read
The uncomfortable truth of a cruise charter payment terms
Many cruise charter ideas do not fail because the concept is weak. They fail because the financial and contractual structure is not aligned with how cruise operators manage risk.
A cruise charter is a commercial maritime commitment. Once a charter contract becomes effective, the sailing is effectively taken out of the market and consumer marketing is discontinued. From that moment, the ship operator carries real commercial exposure. Payment structures exist to mitigate that exposure.
Why cruise lines focus so strongly on payment security
For a cruise operator, charter risk is not theoretical. If a charter collapses late, the opportunity to resell an entire sailing is limited or, in some cases, impossible.
For this reason, charter contracts for events, often referred to as short charters, typically require strong payment security. Depending on the cruise line, this may include a letter of credit issued by a first-class bank, accelerated payment schedules, or other financial guarantees acceptable to the owner.
These mechanisms are not designed to complicate projects. They exist to protect the operator once commercial inventory has been removed from the market.
Standard charter payment logic (simplified)
While each contract is negotiated individually, the underlying logic is consistent across most charter agreements:
the ship is committed and removed from open sale
the operator assumes marketing and opportunity cost risk
cruise charter payment terms are structured to cover that risk early
Standard charter payment terms for short cruise charters (events)
Short cruise charters for corporate, incentive, or themed events typically follow a multi-installment payment structure, designed to progressively protect the ship operator once the charter contract becomes effective and the sailing is removed from the open market.
Based on standard industry practice, a charter payment schedule may include the following installments. The exact structure and timing will vary by project type, cruise line policy, and commercial negotiations.
First installment – at contract signing
An initial payment is due upon execution of the charter contract.
This first installment is typically around 10 percent of the total charter fee and serves to:
secure the vessel contractually
remove the sailing from public sale
allow the cruise line to discontinue consumer marketing
This payment is generally non-refundable (as the other installments), as it compensates the ship operator for immediate opportunity and marketing risk.
Second installment
A second installment is commonly due approximately 18 months prior to departure, often in the range of 20 percent of the charter fee.
This payment confirms the charterer’s long-term financial commitment and allows the cruise line to continue allocating operational and planning resources to the charter project.
Third installment
A third installment is typically due around 12 months prior to sailing, often representing a significant portion of the charter value, for example 30 percent.
At this stage, the vessel is fully committed to the charter program, and owner exposure increases materially.
Fourth installment
An additional installment may be required approximately 9 months prior to departure, again commonly around 30 percent of the charter fee.
By this point, the majority of the charter price has been paid, substantially reducing the ship operator’s commercial risk.
Final installment – before departure
The final balance is usually due from 2 to 6 months prior to sailing, often representing the remaining 10 percent of the charter fee.
In practice, this means that the full charter cost is paid well in advance of departure, leaving limited or no opportunity for the cruise line to resell the sailing should the charter fail.
Payment security and guarantees
In addition to installment payments, cruise lines often require payment security.
Many charter contracts are secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a first-class bank. The format and conditions of the letter of credit are defined at the time of contracting.
Where a letter of credit is not provided, cruise lines may require an accelerated, non-negotiable payment schedule, increasing early cash payments to offset the absence of a bank guarantee.
These mechanisms are not exceptional. They reflect the commercial reality that, once a charter contract is effective, the ship owner assumes irreversible financial exposure.
In most charter projects, the primary challenge is not the total charter price, but the timing mismatch between charter payment obligations and guest ticket sales. Charterers who rely exclusively on future sales without sufficient upfront financial capacity often encounter pressure long before departure, even when market interest is strong.
The two most common deal breakers
1. Inability to provide the requested financial security
Many first-time charterers underestimate what is required to issue a letter of credit or an equivalent guarantee. This often becomes evident late in the process and can stop a project immediately.
When security requirements cannot be met, the only alternatives are:
declining the project, or
restructuring payments to reduce owner risk earlier
2. Misunderstanding non-refundable payments
Charter contracts often include non-refundable deposits or installments. These are not penalties. They are designed to compensate the ship operator for commercial exposure once the sailing is committed.
Assuming that payments will be recoverable if a project changes direction is one of the most common and costly misunderstandings in cruise charter discussions.
Structures that can sometimes unlock a project
There is no universal solution, but several structures may be considered depending on the cruise line, the charterer, and the credibility of the project.
Accelerated payment schemes
In some cases, increasing early payments can reduce perceived risk and allow discussions to progress, even if a letter of credit is not available.
Hybrid booking control models
In specific cases, it is possible to structure arrangements where the ship operator controls bookings directly and receives guest deposits directly. This can reduce credit exposure for the owner and increase transparency.
Charterers must be aware that guest deposits may be subject to strict cancellation conditions and may become non-refundable based on contract terms.
Creative flexibility for qualified charterers
Some cruise lines, particularly smaller operators, may consider tailored structures if:
the charterer is clearly qualified
the project is commercially credible
the sales and marketing plan is realistic
there is confidence in execution
A strong idea alone is not sufficient. The operator is underwriting execution risk.
A real-world scenario (anonymized)
We were involved in an expedition-style charter project developed with an event-driven production concept. The first two installments were paid. Subsequently, the charterer encountered operational issues and could not proceed with the intended production.
In line with the contract structure, the payments were not returned. They were retained to compensate the operator for the commercial and marketing exposure already incurred.
This example illustrates why charter readiness must be financial as well as creative.
Insurance: an essential but often overlooked layer
Charterers should consider insurance at an early stage.
Event cancellation insurance may, subject to policy wording and covered causes, protect against losses linked to cancellation or interruption, including certain non-refundable payments. Coverage depends entirely on underwriting terms, exclusions, and the specific risk profile of the event.
This is precisely why insurance discussions should occur before signing a charter contract, not after.
Where appropriate, specialist introductions can be facilitated through established insurance brokerage channels.
Where appropriate, solutions can be explored through specialist partners such as banchero costa insurance brokers, part of the banchero costa newtork (bancosta) who have experience in maritime and event-related risk.
Scale matters
Not all charters carry the same risk profile.
A river cruise charter is generally more scalable and easier to manage than an ocean-going cruise ship of 3,000 guests, which can involve multi-million-euro commitments.
Many charter ideas are excellent. Only those that are financially structured for their scale can progress.
The role of a strategic cruise charter advisor
The value of a strategic advisor is not in quoting ships or negotiating rates. It lies in:
clarifying payment and risk logic early
aligning expectations before cruise lines commit resources
structuring realistic options
preventing avoidable financial loss
protecting credibility with first-class suppliers
Treating a cruise charter like a retail group booking is the fastest way to stop a project. Structuring it as a commercial undertaking from the outset is the fastest way to advance it.
How can we, bancosta cruise, support your cruise charter projects
Every charter project is different. Some require strict financial discipline. Others benefit from creative structuring, accelerated payments, or hybrid booking models. What they all require is clarity before commitments are made.
As a strategic cruise charter advisor, our role at bancosta cruise is to help:
assess whether a charter concept is commercially and financially realistic
explain payment logic and risk exposure clearly, before contracts are signed
explore workable structures with first-class cruise suppliers
identify appropriate risk-management solutions, including insurance where relevant
If you are considering a cruise charter project and want to understand whether it can be structured realistically, you may find it useful to review my background and experience in this page (link) of our bancosta cruise website.
The right discussion, at the right stage, can make the difference between a project that progresses and one that stops before it starts.
contact me via Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andtrevisan/
or email me directly at: a.trevisan@bancostacruise.com
Comments